The record,
not the summary.
Every point is a canonical event with its sources, its band and its three clocks. The dashed circles are what the record could place no better than the country — they are said, not hidden.
Every number says
what it did not see.
A count without its coverage is not a smaller product: it is another product, and a dishonest one. Here the count and what the count could not see are written together, on the same line and in the same size of type.
They carry a declared reading, a day and a place at city precision or better. Only these enter a count.
Drawn at the point that stands for the region, which is not where it happened. Listed, never added.
Stacked at the capital and never counted inside a drawn area.
Read, but with no usable date: they can enter no window of time.
They have only a topic. No declared reading, so no indicator touches them.
Of the 6,623 events of the last year, 1,868 carry a declared reading, a day and a place at city precision or better. That 28.2 % is what an indicator can count today — and it is written beside the number, not in an annex at the end of the report.
High, medium, low or unknown — and beside it, what holds it there. A number from 0 to 100 hides where it came from.
What the model proposed is drawn blue and dashed until somebody adopts it. Nothing is ever signed in anybody’s name.
When it happened, when we observed it and when it was believed. The third is what lets you go back and know what we knew then.
The same cut,
drawn by another variable.
The camera does not move: the lens changes. The mark keeps its place and its shape — the ring changes, its weight, its stroke, its fill. That is how one map answers different questions without becoming another map.
2,706 at city or better · 795 at region · 3,832 country only. An area counts only the first.
The question that keeps
watching without you.
Coming down, the frame closes on an area drawn by hand and approved. The instrument counts what enters it every week, compares it with its own baseline and alerts when it crosses the threshold you set — with the coverage inside the alert, always.
A question with no news leaves no gap: it says “six days without counted evidence”. Silence is an answer and is written as one.
34 counted in the 7 days to 11 Sept 2026 against 3.9/wk over the previous 9 weeks — ×9.
34 counted · 6 at region · 111 by country · 0 no day
What belongs together,
and who said it belongs.
A conflict is not a label: it is a set of situations, and every situation is an anchor and a kind — Kyiv · armed attack. The size of the disc is how many events it holds. The dashed threads join situations that share actors: the machine proposed them, nobody has signed them.
The 201 situations of this conflict were proposed by the machine; a person has adopted none of them yet, so none is drawn in copper. The drawing carries all of them.
23 events under this situation · 21 threads to other situations. Proposed by the machine: nobody has adopted it.
Every event can be
walked again.
Three clocks, not one: when it happened, when we observed it and when it was believed. The third is what lets you go back to a date and read the record as it stood that day — with what we did not know then.
23 events under “Kyiv Armed Attack”; the record hands 22 and 22 are here. The line says both things: what there is, and since when.
And 324 with an exact time, 48 with only a month and 17 with no usable date. The date’s precision is kept, not rounded.
When it entered the record, which is almost never when it happened. With the outlet that published it — 48 distinct in this window — and the distance it reported from.
724 await review. The third clock lets you return to a date and read the record as it stood — with what we did not know then.
They share 7 actors. The machine proposed the thread, which is why it is dashed and has no arrowhead: when a person asserts it, it becomes solid and carries their name and their date.
Ask the record
like an economist.
One criterion after another, written as a sentence read aloud. Save the sentence and it becomes a screen you can open tomorrow — or set to watch.
Counted: with a reading, a day and a place at city precision or better. The other 117 appear listed, never added — and the date of the newest counted says as much about the record as about the ground. That sentence appears on the screen too.
What the Iran sanctions are actually pricing
The argument rests on events of the record, not on memory: every claim cites the event that holds it, and the event carries its sources and its band in the reader’s sight.
The causes the author asserts are marked as theirs. The record asserts no causes: it keeps facts, and it keeps who said what about them.
The argument, signed
and correctable.
What the record cannot say on its own: why it matters. Read today and read again in a year knowing what changed, who changed it and when.
Four things, and how they hold.
Everything in this row is public and free to read. What is sold is depth: time, the instruments that work without you, the output and the seats.
One fact, once, with its sources, its band and its three clocks — however many outlets tell it.
People, organisations, places, assets and event names, each with its own history on the record.
The events that belong together, with the graph that joins them and the mark of who decided it. Under the war in Ukraine alone there are 201.
An anchor and a kind per situation — armed attack, infrastructure damage, heavy-weapon movement — and the signed argument that walks them.
Depth is charged for,
never the evidence.
The map, every event, every source, every band and its reason, the entities, the situations, the Screener, the Feed and the Lenses: free for anyone, always. What is paid for is time, the instruments that keep working without you, the output and the shared desk.
Whoever wants the record and the map, and wants to check it for themselves.
- ·The map and every event, in the languages it exists in
- ·Sources, bands and what holds each band
- ·Entities, situations and what the machine proposed
- ·Screener, Feed and Lenses
- ·20 screens and 20 watches
- ·A preview of every analysis
- —Time: the vintage and the comparison
The analyst, the economist, the correspondent who works the record alone.
- ·Everything in Observe
- ·Every full analysis, with its corrections
- ·The Believed clock: the record as it stood on a date
- ·Compare a window with the one before
- ·100 screens and 100 watches · alerts by email
- ·The brief: your desk, delivered
- ·50 exports a month
Three to fifty people who share the watching.
- ·Everything in Analyze
- ·Shared screens, watches and folders
- ·Roles: who invites, who asserts
- ·Alerts routed to the desk
- ·Exports without a cap
- ·Read API · 120 requests/min
- ·Up to 50 seats
Ministries, newsrooms and research bodies.
- ·Everything in Coordinate, without caps
- ·Data residency and single sign-on
- ·Your own feeds brought into the record
- ·An agreed level of service
- ·Help getting started
- ·Invoicing and contract
Line by line. If something stops being free, it is said on this page before it happens, and never retroactively.
The first two hundred Analyze members at $190 a year, the price frozen while they stay. Their watches and their screens are the first vintages the product will have.
The prices are new. Nobody is charged without a checkout, nothing that was free became paid, and the price on this page is the price that is paid.
Whoever has to answer with evidence.
Whoever has to say what happened in one area this week, and hold it up with dated, placed evidence.
Observe to look · Analyze to watchConsultancies, insurers and risk teams that need the record under their own report, with output to their tools.
Analyze and Coordinate · read APIMinistries and bodies that need residency, single sign-on, their own feeds and a level of service.
Institutions · a conversationOpen the map.
No account needed.
The record grows every fifteen minutes, with or without you. Look today and come back in a year: what changed will be said, with its date and with who changed it.